Organization of tasks according to priorities, avoiding unnecessary work.Split the project into short cycles (or iterations).They all have in common the following pillars: There are so many different agile methodologies that could be applied to an organization, depending on its specificities and context. What’s different here is that customer comes first: actually, agility put customers’ satisfaction at the very heart of its practices, rather than contract terms. The agile approach can be hence considered as the ideal solution to ensure more efficient and secure project management… but beware of some preconceived ideas: agile doesn’t mean no rules ! In fact, even agile methods require a minimum of guidelines to be truly effective. Nowadays, the continuous advancements in technology are challenging more and more traditional methods, particularly because of their complexity and lack of flexibility. This way, it provides clear guidelines to implement any operation while making it possible not only to define in advance any resources (including human and financial ones) and roles, but also to estimate the process duration. To put it another way, the PERT method is a traditional approach for process development framing which focuses on task scheduling coordination. Moreover, this tools also aims to highlight what has to be done fist, depending on its priority as well as the set deadline. More precisely, it is a network chart that represents all the tasks and milestones involved to effectively get your project across the finish line. ![]() The Program Evaluation and Review Technique (aka PERT) is a useful graphical representation to define the sequencing of specific project phases. Note: if you wish to learn more about this, we’ll deal with the Agile Gantt chart in another article of ours, as to help you share your project vision easily throughout time, also taking into account the potential changes along the way. Ultimately, the V-Model represents a rigid project management approach whose final purpose is to ensure deliverables’ compliance not only to customers’ expectation, but also to potential norms and standards. But it can end up being a useful model when all the specifics of the product to develop are crystal clear from the beginning, invariable and must comply with high quality standards. However, it is important to underline that it is not a suitable frame for every business because of its lack of both flexibility and adaptability. It is a very structured, linear method where the completion of each predefined phase leads to the next one, streaming down just like a waterfall, with no possibility to step back to the previous stage. The Waterfall approach is the most frequently used one to simplify project management through a strict sequential process. Nevertheless, traditional project management is still an effective approach that may suit some kinds of organizations. Here follows some details about the three most popular traditional methods: 1. ![]() Actually, the main downside of traditional project management methods is that change comes with significant impacts, especially in terms of budget and time waste, since it will be necessary to review each and every project phase to detect precisely what has to be modified and subsequently restart from there. However, the major risk for methods that does not take into account any potential changes is to deliver a product that ultimately no longer meets the customers’ expectations, since their needs may have changed along the project progress. ![]() In other words, it is a systematic work organization whose aim is to avoid any possible risk, by sticking to the initial customers’ guidelines. according to these pre-defined objectives. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |